OK, Commonsen, I'll take that as a vote of support for AG for AG, and I applaud your respect for a woman's right to privacy. Thankfully, I guess we won't be hearing any more from you about overturning Roe v. Wade, and I expect we can count on your support for choice in the future. For the record, many anti-choice commentators have been quite vociferous in their disdain for Gonzales, and I would view CNN as just being complete in presenting both sides-- more than we could expect from Fox. For example, Peroutka is not happy with AG: http://www.covenantnews.com/peroutka050114.htm
and USA Today (or is that a liberal rag, too?) also listed prominent conservative groups that were uncomfortable with AG: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-11-10-gonzales-inside-usat_x.htm
If gay marriage is a "state" issue, then what about the Senate's inaction do you disagree with? That's a disconnect to me.
2 comments:
OK, Commonsen, I'll take that as a vote of support for AG for AG, and I applaud your respect for a woman's right to privacy. Thankfully, I guess we won't be hearing any more from you about overturning Roe v. Wade, and I expect we can count on your support for choice in the future. For the record, many anti-choice commentators have been quite vociferous in their disdain for Gonzales, and I would view CNN as just being complete in presenting both sides-- more than we could expect from Fox. For example,
Peroutka is not happy with AG: http://www.covenantnews.com/peroutka050114.htm
and USA Today (or is that a liberal rag, too?) also listed prominent conservative groups that were uncomfortable with AG: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-11-10-gonzales-inside-usat_x.htm
If gay marriage is a "state" issue, then what about the Senate's inaction do you disagree with? That's a disconnect to me.
Post a Comment